Skip to topic | Skip to bottom
Home
Ilanet
Ilanet.AlgorithmInOutcomesr1.5 - 16 Jun 2020 - 17:26 - GregorioIvanoff

Start of topic | Skip to actions

2019


Action in algorithms


Political goals: "The purpose should be, among other objectives related to algorithms, to achieve social equality so that no person shall be denied opportunities or benefits for reasons unrelated to ability and, in the fulfillment of that goal, to correct the conditions of disadvantage experienced by women, forest peoples, persons with disabilities and members of visible minorities by giving effect to the principle that equity means more than treating persons in the same way but also requires special measures and the accommodation of differences" (adapted from Employment equity (Canada), Wikipedia, 2015). Objetivos políticos: "O propósito deveria ser, entre outros objetivos relacionados com algoritmos, alcançar a igualdade social para que a ninguém seja negada oportunidades ou benefícios por razões não relacionadas à capacidade e, no cumprimento dessa meta, corrigir as condições de desvantagem experimentadas por mulheres, povos da floresta, pessoas com deficiência e membros de minorias visíveis, dando efeito ao princípio de que equidade significa mais do que tratar pessoas da mesma forma, mas também requer medidas especiais e a acomodação de diferenças" (adaptado de Equidade no emprego (Canadá), Wikipedia, 2015).


Keywords: governance in algorithm, cohesiveness in algorithm, action in algorithms, outcomes in action, social equality, science


Português: algoritmo em resultados


Claims in practice education 2019 / Educação Reivindicações em prática 2019: Risks in linkages / Riscos em vínculos. First edition: March - June, Second edition: August - November / Primeira edição: março - junho, Segunda edição: agosto - novembro. Education enacted from the production platform indicated in 2019 Scorecard / Educação concretizada a partir da plataforma de produção indicada em pontos 2019, 26 December / dez. 2018. Available from / Disponível em < http://www.ilanet.com.br/cgi-local/portal/bin/view/Ilanet/ClaimsInPracticeEducation?skin=print.pattern >. access on / Acesso em 26 December / dez. 2018.

HEETER, Carrie; MAGERKO, Brian; MEDLER, Ben; FITZGERALD, Joe. Game Design and the Challenge-Avoiding Impression Manager Player Type, July 12, 2008. Available from < http://adam.cc.gatech.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/challenge-avoider-meaningfulplay.pdf >. access on 21 July 2013.

MACE, Michael. Google logic: why Google does the things it does the way it does: Puzzled about why Google closes successful products such as Reader while backing others such as self-driving cars? A former Apple and Palm executive explains. Available from < http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/jul/09/google-android-reader-why >. access on 20 July 2013.

OREMUS, Will. Who Controls Your Facebook Feed. A small team of engineers in Menlo Park. A panel of anonymous power users around the world. And, increasingly, you. Available from < http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/cover_story/2016/01/how_facebook_s_news_feed_algorithm_works.single.html >. access on 22 January 2016.

Simplicity is the goal. Available from < http://www.lessonsoffailure.com/tag/knuth/ >. access on 23 May 2019.

Somers, James. The Coming Software Apocalypse: A small group of programmers wants to change how we code—before catastrophe strikes, Sep 26, 2017. Available from < https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/09/saving-the-world-from-code/540393/ >. access on 26 April 2019.

Temporal logic of actions. Available from < https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporal_logic_of_actions >. access on 23 May 2019.

Updating governance / Governança que atualiza: Global Challenge / Desafio global. Remodelling Global Cooperation: Claims in practice 2017 / Remodelando a Cooperação Global: Reivindicações em prática 2017. Forming a coalition of people to develop a competition entry. / Formando uma coalizão de pessoas para desenvolver uma entrada de competição, 21 September / set. 2017. Available from / Disponível em < http://www.ilanet.com.br/cgi-local/portal/bin/view/Ilanet/UpdatingGovernance?skin=print.pattern >. access on / Acesso em 21 September / set. 2017.

Viholainen, Antti. Incoherence of a concept image and erroneous conclusions in the case of differentiability. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Jyväskylä (Finland). The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, ISSN 1551-3440, Vol. 5, nos.2&3, pp.231-248 2008 ©Montana Council of Teachers of Mathematics & Information Age Publishing. Available from < http://scholarworks.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1124&context=tme >. access on 17 June 2016.

Who pays for science? Available from < https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/who_pays >. access on 20 May 2019.

YANAY, N., The Social Construction of Autonomy: A Motivational Model Social Behavior and Personality, Society for Personality Research (Inc.), 22(3), 209-226, 1994.

-- GregorioIvanoff - 05 Jun 2019
to top


Direitos de cópia © 1999-2024 pelos autores que contribuem. Todo material dessa plataforma de colaboração é propriedade dos autores que contribuem.
Ideias, solicitações, problemas relacionados a Ilanet? Dê sua opinião
Copyright © 1999-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Ilanet? Send feedback